Not known Details About h335 powder load data
Not known Details About h335 powder load data
Blog Article
Conclusion is that in my rifle I could get a little bit more velocity with a bit a lot less electrical power using H322. That further one hundred FPS makes minimal big difference in trajectory, but gives me fifty-90 ft lbs more Vitality for most looking predicaments.
Quoted: H-335 is really a traditional .223 Rem powder and was oft encouraged by ballistician Ed Matunas who did several reloading manuals as a powder that shot nicely in a number of rifles. Originally a army surplus powder, it is currently newly-manufactured for Hodgdon. Furthermore, since it is a ball powder, it meters much better than extensive-grain IMR 3031.
I’m using Hogdon H335 which I’ve in no way utilised before and there’s a significant disparity in load data.
The report relates the close to destruction (bolt lugs established again and various hurt) of a custom gun from slight excursions over and above reloading guide maximums during a ladder screening technique. This was using H335 and the author was chasing velocity for the duration of load enhancement.
I can not imagine any blend of powder and caliber where by there will be far more data out there. bluetopper
Add to quotation Only present this person #4 · Sep eight, 2016 Here is a connection into a DuPont archive file that reveals IMR powders and contains Remington bullets. It really is old data. Note that the pictures on the powder are on the old square cans.
Rebs, your did not determine what grain bullet you happen to be working with. I have found H335 to generally be an Fantastic powder for 55gr bullets, but dismal for heavier bullets like SMK 69/77gr bullets.
Personally, my practical experience and opinion of the two powders has long been practically the opposite of yours. CFE 223 will execute much better the for a longer time your barrel is as well as the heavier the bullet you use. My thoughts are that CFE 223 is correct around the verge of remaining much too gradual of the powder to even use in 223.
This isn’t uncommon as I’ve observed the disparity in load tips all through my 40 years of reloading. But it doesn’t harm to check with.
Your reloads could slot in the Howa action, but you'll have an excessive amount shoulder clearance which may reduce the precision and also may perhaps result in break up circumstances within the circumference of the case.
Multiple purposes can be found while in the 222 Remington and other varmint cartridges. Prairie Canine shooters will find this a favourite, as J.B. Hodgdon has for years!
This isn’t uncommon as I’ve noticed the disparity in load recommendations throughout my 40 many years of reloading. Nevertheless it doesn’t hurt to check with.
If okay they return in the situation, if not they go within the hopper and I then use the powder evaluate and scale to recharge All those circumstances Using click here the powder cost I would like. No use producing ammo that will not shoot into the pistol/rifle and my capability. A number of my good loads are a pain from the butt to load (just one motive I'm going to BLC2 for almost all of the .223 loads).
The post details out by instance the error of utilizing load facts for a single company’s bullet on A different’s bullet of different design but precisely the same weight. Being an aside, a known (never to me!) challenge with H335 is revealed.